How does education and research figure in the UN Climate Agreement?

Published on Wednesday, 16 December 2015
Academic and student representatives at the EI workshop in Paris Academic and student representatives at the EI workshop in Paris

The Paris Agreement that was finalised on December 12th has had a mixed reception. For some it is an historic document that will keep global warming in check. For others it will deliver too little too late. Without repeating all of the arguments here this post is intended to just focus on what it says about education and research. Here there is some potential.

The document consists of 3 parts - Decision / Annex / Agreement. The 29 Articles in the Agreement are the ones that are potentially legally binding. For education trade unions the main references to our sector are distributed throughout the text. The most important one is Article 12 (Page 28). This refers specifically to education. It is the shortest article in the whole document consisting of just one sentence which reads: 'Parties shall cooperate in taking measures, as appropriate, to enhance climate change education, training, public awareness, public participation and public access to information, recognizing the importance of these steps with respect to enhancing actions under this Agreement.' 

There are a couple of things worth noting here. Firstly in previous versions of the text it did not appear as a stand-alone Article. It was referenced initially in 'Finance' and then 'Capacity Building'. The decision to include it as a separate duty could be seen as giving it greater prominence and therefore one that as trades unions we would support. Secondly, in the final version the standard of duty is 'shall' rather than 'should' which is a stronger requirement. When it was in the earlier draft it was couched in the term 'should' which implies a weaker duty. Education also appears in Article 11(1) (Page 27) on 'Capacity Building'.

Research is referenced in Articles 7(7)(c) (Page 25) on 'Adaptation' and 10(5) (Page 27) on 'Technology Transfer and Development'. Here there is a mixture of 'shall' and 'should' but this still represents an opportunity to ensure that the research activities carried out by our members are recognised as a vital part of making the low carbon transition.

Despite the relative positive references on education and research, there are major concerns whether the agreement provides a framework for effective change. For trades unions our ability to intervene in the process has been compromised by the failure to put the duties on 'just transition of the workforce and the creation of decent work and quality jobs' into the operational part of the text. This reference was eventually moved into the Annex (Preamble). The ITUC response to this and other concerns can be found here.

In conclusion, we have something that provides an opportunity to promote our policies on education and research for sustainability. It means that national governments and the respective education sectors will face additional pressure to address this issue. As unions we need to be sure that the workforce is effectively represented in this process.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

Graham Petersen

Graham is the National Environment Co-ordinator for the University and College Union (UCU) in the UK. He has attended UN Climate Conferences as a member of the ITUC delegation. He was a trade union studies lecturer for 33 years before starting his work on sustainable development in 2008.

Other blog posts

The panama papers, public education and democracy

Written by
on Tuesday, 05 April 2016

What have the Panama Papers – the latest in a series of leaks on the rich, the powerful and data – got to do with public education and democracy? Lots, I am going to suggest in my presentation to an important policy and research conference hosted by Education International in Rome today and tomorrow, because they tell us something about the kind of society we have become, and why it is that a public good, like education, is increasingly viewed…


Teaching Students to Improve the World

Written by
on Tuesday, 10 January 2017

The Southern Poverty Law Center in the United States documented a record figure of 867 bias incidents in the ten days following the Presidential election, arguably a result of the very divisive presidential campaign in the United States, with its anti-immigrant and anti globalization undertones. This development, and others such as the Brexit vote in Britain, signal that a significant proportion of the population does not embrace the increased frequency and intensity of interactions with people from many different identities…

blog archive